Almost forgot about this one. If by “reality” you mean your own ideas of what will happen in a thousand years, well, it might be teue, I’m blind. I forgot to bring my cristal ball, you see.

But you are also delusional. I was talking about historical facts, you are talking about a simple speculation of your own, and treat it as a fact that is fit to be used in an argument.

Let me help you out here (again): Nobody knows what happenes in a thousand years after colonisation, as what we call colonisation happened a few hundred years ago at best. So far the opposite of what you speculate is happening.

Again, if you don’t see the difference between annexing adjoining territories or conquering (see modern day Israel), and colonising faraway places (see the British in e.g. Australia) to abuse its resources, well, you need to read my reply again, really slowly, and try to comprehend the words. Never did I claim conquerors respected the conquered. I claimed colonists didn’t. And while a conquered land eventually becomes part of the mainland (either by replacing or absorbing its inhabitants), a colony remains “inferior”, along with its inhabitants, unless proper genocide (North America, Australia), makes “room” for the newcomers (white people, FYI). Whatever similar things the Chinese empire did, they did it locally. I know you don’t get the meaning of “global”, but frankly, I’m tired about arguing with trolls.

What you said would happen in a thousand years is more likely true about conquered land (see e.g. Hungary), exactly what I was saying. Nothing suggests the same about colonies. I suggest you read some history books that actually deal with the question, but first learn to differentiate between facts and ideas.